Piety in Pieces: How Medieval Readers Customized their Manuscripts

doi:10.11647/obp.0094

Please be advised that, due to the Christmas and New Year holiday season, shipping delays may occur. We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.

Piety in Pieces: How Medieval Readers Customized their Manuscripts - cover image

DOI

https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0094

License

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Copyright

Kathryn M. Rudy

Published On

2016-09-26

ISBN

Paperback978-1-78374-233-2

Hardback978-1-78374-234-9

PDF978-1-78374-235-6

HTML978-1-80064-513-4

XML978-1-78374-622-4

EPUB978-1-78374-236-3

MOBI978-1-78374-237-0

Language

English

Print Length

412 pages (xviii + 394)

Dimensions

Paperback156 x 29 x 234 mm(6.14" x 1.13" x 9.21")

Hardback156 x 32 x 234 mm(6.14" x 1.25" x 9.21")

Weight

Paperback1717g (60.57oz)

Hardback2116g (74.64oz)

Media

Illustrations213

Tables5

Funding

Leverhulme Trust

University of Edinburgh

OCLC Number

1030365080

LCCN

2019452725

BIC

DSBB
HRLC

BISAC

LIT007000
LIT011000
LIT025040

LCC

Z105

Keywords

Medieval manuscripts
codicology
book personalisation
material culture of the book
customization
religion
devotional
medievalism
medieval studies

History of the Book

Piety in Pieces

How Medieval Readers Customized their Manuscripts

Kathryn M. Rudy (author)

Winner of the 2017 Choice Review's Outstanding Academic Titles.

Medieval manuscripts resisted obsolescence. Made by highly specialised craftspeople (scribes, illuminators, book binders) with labour-intensive processes using exclusive and sometimes exotic materials (parchment made from dozens or hundreds of skins, inks and paints made from prized minerals, animals and plants), books were expensive and built to last. They usually outlived their owners. Rather than discard them when they were superseded, book owners found ways to update, amend and upcycle books or book parts.

These activities accelerated in the fifteenth century. Most manuscripts made before 1390 were bespoke and made for a particular client, but those made after 1390 (especially books of hours) were increasingly made for an open market, in which the producer was not in direct contact with the buyer. Increased efficiency led to more generic products, which owners were motivated to personalise. It also led to more blank parchment in the book, for example, the backs of inserted miniatures and the blanks ends of textual components. Book buyers of the late fourteenth and throughout the fifteenth century still held onto the old connotations of manuscripts—that they were custom-made luxury items—even when the production had become impersonal.

Owners consequently purchased books made for an open market and then personalised them, filling in the blank spaces, and even adding more components later. This would give them an affordable product, but one that still smacked of luxury and met their individual needs. They kept older books in circulation by amending them, attached items to generic books to make them more relevant and valuable, and added new prayers with escalating indulgences as the culture of salvation shifted.

Rudy considers ways in which book owners adjusted the contents of their books from the simplest (add a marginal note, sew in a curtain) to the most complex (take the book apart, embellish the components with painted decoration, add more quires of parchment). By making sometimes extreme adjustments, book owners kept their books fashionable and emotionally relevant. This study explores the intersection of codicology and human desire.

Rudy shows how increased modularisation of book making led to more standardisation but also to more opportunities for personalisation. She asks: What properties did parchment manuscripts have that printed books lacked? What are the interrelationships among technology, efficiency, skill loss and standardisation?

Endorsements

This is a brilliant contribution to the field of the materiality of Medieval manuscripts which currently emerges as a highly important intersection of art history, codicology, cultural studies and history of devotion.

Henrike Lähnemann

Chair of Medieval German Literature and Linguistics, University of Oxford

Reviews

[The book is] a joy to read. [It] instructs the reader to look with more attention to manuscripts: codices are not a mere bunch of texts or images; they are objects that tell a story about the way people in the Middle Ages lived with books, how they used them, and personalized them. Over the last decade, Kate Rudy has surprised us several times with unexpected views on manuscripts, which enables us to understand these 'stories of manuscripts' and 'the story of the manuscripts' better. I do hope she still has a few more of these new views up her sleeve.

Daniël Ermens

"Kathryn M. Rudy, Piety in Pieces: How Medieval Readers Customized their Manuscripts". The Medieval Low Countries (2295-3493), vol. 5, 2018. doi:10.1484/J.MLC.5.116547

Full Review